Supreme Court Urges AAP Leader Raghav Chadha to Apologize for Suspension

In a recent development, the Supreme Court of India has directed suspended Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Raghav Chadha to meet with Rajya Sabha Chairperson Jagdeep Dhankhar and offer an unconditional apology following his suspension from the House. The three-judge bench, led by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, expressed hope that the Chairperson would consider Chadha’s apology sympathetically. The suspension had arisen due to Chadha’s failure to obtain consent from five Rajya Sabha members before proposing their names for a Select Committee.

Chadha’s counsel assured the bench that the young Member of Parliament had no intention to undermine the dignity of the House and was willing to apologize. The apex court had previously voiced concern over Chadha’s indefinite suspension, emphasizing the impact on the people’s right to representation and questioning the Privileges Committee’s authority to issue such suspensions. The court will review the matter after the Diwali vacation and assess the developments in the case.

Raghav Chadha, the youngest member of the Rajya Sabha, has moved the Supreme Court to challenge his indefinite suspension from the Upper House, which occurred on August 11. He faced suspension on grounds of a “breach of privilege” for including the names of five Rajya Sabha MPs in a select committee without their consent during the Monsoon Session. The suspension followed a motion by Leader of the House Piyush Goyal, who alleged that Chadha had included names without consent in a proposed select committee for the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Bill, 2023. Chadha asserts that his suspension is unlawful and without proper authority.

The Supreme Court had previously expressed concerns about Chadha’s indefinite suspension, emphasizing the potential implications for constituents who are left unrepresented. The court also questioned the authority of the Privileges Committee to indefinitely suspend a member of the political opposition from the House, characterizing it as a serious matter. This ongoing legal battle highlights the intersection of parliamentary privilege, political representation, and the checks and balances within the Indian parliamentary system, making it a matter of considerable significance.

Pic Courtesy: google/ images are subject to copyright